<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: anatomy of an image &#8211; part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bwunderground.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/anatomy-of-an-image-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bwunderground.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/anatomy-of-an-image-part-1/</link>
	<description>the place for black &#38; white photographers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://bwunderground.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/anatomy-of-an-image-part-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwunderground.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-6</guid>
		<description>The colors are distracting to me and my eye doesn&#039;t know where to go to first. In the bw version I go straight to the cowgirl. 
Good luck with the blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The colors are distracting to me and my eye doesn&#8217;t know where to go to first. In the bw version I go straight to the cowgirl.<br />
Good luck with the blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photo444</title>
		<link>http://bwunderground.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/anatomy-of-an-image-part-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>photo444</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwunderground.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-5</guid>
		<description>The B+W image is a much more compelling rendition of the image. You see much more detail. Example in the color version the pierced nipples are missed and in the B+W they are pronounced. Also the tattoos are much richer in the the B+W image. Well in my opinion anyhow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The B+W image is a much more compelling rendition of the image. You see much more detail. Example in the color version the pierced nipples are missed and in the B+W they are pronounced. Also the tattoos are much richer in the the B+W image. Well in my opinion anyhow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KarmaPink</title>
		<link>http://bwunderground.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/anatomy-of-an-image-part-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>KarmaPink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwunderground.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Cort~ I&#039;ve commented on the forum on this but now that I have seen both versions I have to say...I&#039;d still be drawn to the BW before the color. The BW speaks louder (as it usually does) and the details in the tats are more noticable (to me anyway). Nicely done, I look forward to reading your blog. I still love to grab my film cam and shoot BW with it. The element of you get what you get seems to appeal to me for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cort~ I&#8217;ve commented on the forum on this but now that I have seen both versions I have to say&#8230;I&#8217;d still be drawn to the BW before the color. The BW speaks louder (as it usually does) and the details in the tats are more noticable (to me anyway). Nicely done, I look forward to reading your blog. I still love to grab my film cam and shoot BW with it. The element of you get what you get seems to appeal to me for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
